The notion that after 40 years of developing the oil sands more is good while Alberta is spending borrowed money isnt in the least believable.
Value added brings prosperity but its been rejected in favor of exporting raw bitumen. The only reason given was a concern for the environment, increasing GHG through value added would harm our international reputation,,, i guess.
Making it someone elses problem is sctually producing more GHG than value added. Definetly not a believable reason to omit value added from the budget in favor of liquidating raw resources.
As previously noted investors in anything other than raw resources and currency speculators has been
absent since 2006. Value added requires investment.
I rather hoped government would see the wisdom of engaging in fixing their failed policies before now.
as expected they would prefer, as
meltdown before changing.
update on 'War as an Investment' in 2007 posted to
Russia and China are both increasing military spending while increasing influence in Syria Iran Afghanistan and othet places that have American influences.
Are the 5000 F-35s good planning?
Sry im not impressed either and im out of sugar coating.
Enough of the expected I'll check fir some hope.