Monday, December 24, 2012

But First The Conclusion

The government will continue to deny even though all the info in my blog is public information.
They are already saying there is no problem, no one did anything wrong.
 Two crime titles in two years (intentionally omitted in the crime rate) followed by a child poverty record and no one did anything wrong......
I doesn't matter if everyone knows its a complete lie, its government, deny deny deny. Between now and 2020 Gen U will be impossible to deny, but.
My guess is the government will try, "no one saw this coming". Fifteen years since the report 'for the sake of the children' and what they saw was, the revenue from child support is far more important to the next election than to the next generation.
Using the numbers of single mothers on welfare and the amount of child support paid it could be as much as one quarter of a billion dollars annually, just from British Columbia with a population of 4.4 million and still single mother families are leading the charge into poverty.
There hasn't been such a brutal oppressive tax on fathers and their children in any civilised society since the dark ages.
Government says child support is for
the children, they said child support is the most important thing to a child of divorce yet its just a tax added to revenue. They say fathers should pay for their children yet the family doesn't get a dime of it. Government knows the higher the % of child support collected the higher youth problems, they know its failed our children but not their coffers.
Even with the start of governments denial they created Gen U don't expect any change. The global economy is failing because its based on colonial economics. I've put a global transportation makeover on the table as at least some future hope for Gen U. If governments are willing to let us slide closer to WW 3 then we can certainly assume the future of Gen U is of no interest.
Thats it for my reporting on the situation, now that you've read the conclusion you should quit reading, the rest is just ugly truth.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

In closing I leave my children with this.

I know right now my kids aren't thinking about why they had to grow up without their father.
Its unlikely that their mothers explanation, I should have had a better lawyer, makes any sense to them. I certainly don't see how such a huge impact should even be placed in the hands of a lawyer let alone be decided by one, and I doubt they do.
I can assure my children it has nothing to do with my abilities to continue to do my job as father.
It certainly has nothing to do with having a better lawyer.
In BC as in most jurisdictions globally, if you are applying to the courts for custody through state subsidies for a legal aid lawyer you must sign over your child support rights to the state.
Any child support paid by the non custodial parent is collected and retained by the state.
Simply put it means give your mother sole custody and tax me.
I couldn't be your father so I filled my time finding out why the court ignored its principle mandate of the best interests of the child. Its done.
It was rubber stamped from the beginning, sole custody and tax, as is all the 10s of thousands of others.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012


A new record high poverty report puts 80% of children in poverty living in Vancouver BC, along with 2 crime titles in 2 years the evidense is undeniable.
Sole custody is a tax grab.

The government is raising revenue on the backs of the most vulnerable children.
In 1990 the federal government voted unanimously to end child poverty by 2000. It was was worse in 2000 which was followed up with record sole custody child support decisions, because of that its again worse now.
The revenue government is raising to fund other spending is child support collected. Every single parent on welfare must sign over child support rights to government which collects and spends it.
The common arguement is fathers should pay for their children, no arguement. Should they support a social safty net funded by all tax payers that they presumably pay to improve the child's life, arguably not.
However the government feels its revenue is so important it allows the collection agency to ignore the law. It is so important that family court rules sole custody and the tax in 100% of custody cases with welfare involved, excluding homicidial drug addicts. The government uses sole custody to generate revenue but hides it by claiming it for the children yet they don't get a single dime extra. Its rubber stamped from the first hearing, taxable.
Family court has nothing to do with the best interests of the child, its all about generated revenue on the backs of the most vunerable children as per new poverty report.
The amount the government collects is staggering, BC collects a top % of child support owed. The amount collected from our population of 3 million is in the 10s of millions,,, every month.
Gender based sole custody isnt womens empowerment, its leading the charge into poverty. The government has done an excellent job convincing women poverty is the new empowerment.
Its all about the tax man and not about the children.
It is what it is but it ain't my is which is why I decided there is enough evidense of this immoral behavior and I need not collect more..
It will not matter how much government plans on spending or how much it dreams it can spend to control the results, it won't be near enough. Gen U will settle the issue by 2020.
With that I wish you all good luck avoiding the consequences.