Friday, August 23, 2013

No justice yet.

After the 1999 report for the sake of the children the minister of justice, under instructions from the federal justice committee, was to meet with provincial AGs to guide family court away from sole custody to lessen the trauma to the child in losing a parent. In the years that followed the courts took sole custody to historic highs. The results of what is nothing short of massive child abuse are in and just, if not worse than predicted in the government report.

Vancouver BC. 2009 property crime capital of north america, even though only 5% of single parent children get in trouble, its 80% of youth in trouble, 80% of prison inmates etc. Double sole custody and the crime rate goes up by 80%. The following year the spike in crime attracted more gangs per capita than any other place on the planet. 2011, a dismal youth mental health report and historic child poverty. The child poverty is a result of government clawing back child support.

The governments response hasn't changed, no one did anything wrong yet refuse to address the charge of using sole custody to create government revenue by clawing back child support, on a massive scale.

Over a dozen years ago I started an internet campaign to expose the ruthless methods the Canadian government employs to increase revenue an the backs of our most vulnerable children for those that recall. A little further along the evidense the crime rate has been cooked is posted. The latest puts the crime rate at 1972 levels. The equation that explains planning mega prisons. 
Double sole custody, double the crime and double the governments vig. The real crime rate would instantly the perps.
Presume joint physical custody or handcuffs? Maybe both if they keep denying they are the root cause of child poverty, a greedy dead beat government.
no justice no investment


  1. We are witness to the deviation sole custody is having on society. PJ physical custody is in the best interests of the child and the arguments against have long ago been proven false.
    Arguments against range from the absurd to implying hate to absolute slime.
    Sole custody is needed to protect women and children from fathers is absurd and not supported by the facts.
    Implying its dead best fathers and not government clawing back child support is hateful slime.
    Stating child support is for the chidren is fraud, child support is a direct tax on non custodial parents and worth billions in government revenue.
    PJPC won't work unless the parents get along is way past absurd. If the parents got along they probably wouldn't have gotten divorced.
    The only truth left, the divorce act is nothing more than a revenue generator in the billions for a dead beat government. It has nothing to do with the best interests of the child.
    If it takes handcuffs to straighten this out I'll sign the writ.

  2. Its ironic the media has made a big deal out of government creating an enemy list when they have a hate list.
    Raising the issue of the best interests of the child puts one on the government hate list, labeled as a dead beat father trying to get out of paying child support. In fact its a dead beat government money grab on the backs of our most vulnerable children.
    Its never been about child support, I'm paying it for the third time. Even though I legally need not pay it I refuse to sign the repayment plan waiver as I'm not now nor have I ever been in arrears. I pay but under protest its been paid and confirmed by the collection agency.
    Easy to make the hate list exposing how the latest child poverty record isn't the result of the majority of child support paid but a dead beat governments greed seizing the majority of child support paid.
    I would consider it a feather if I made the hate list for,,,

    no justice, no investment

  3. On the first day of the CMA conference the government encouraged the doctors to take a stronger position on DV.
    Even though the majority of DV is started by the female they also suffer the majority of reported injuries.
    CMA should note the majority of male abusers where abused as children most often from a single parent family. Where sole custody generates abusers they should support presumed joint physical custody to reduce the number of abusers and thereby victims.
    Talk to MacKay, he's responsible for the illegal record child poverty use of sole custody to generate a tax that increases the number of DV abusers and victims.